If you’ve been following our ItalyGet blog, you know the journey to Italian citizenship jure sanguinis (by bloodline) is facing some headwinds. Recent legislative moves, often bundled under the “Decreto Tajani” discussions, have definitely stirred the pot, leading to real uncertainty about how long applications might take and what the process involves going forward. This includes concerns surrounding the Court of Rome citizenship procedures.
Now, adding another layer to this conversation is a significant new ordinance coming out of the Tribunale Ordinario di Roma (Ordinary Court of Rome). This isn’t happening in a vacuum – it reflects similar questions raised before (you might remember the Bologna case) and puts the very foundation of jure sanguinis under a constitutional microscope, particularly concerning citizenship rules.
Let’s be clear: our goal here isn’t to put anyone off pursuing their Italian heritage. Quite the opposite. We want to give you a clear picture of the legal discussions happening right now, showing the different forces pulling in this debate. As your legal team, we see ourselves right in the thick of it, working hard to protect our clients’ rights within this changing environment related to Court of Rome citizenship applications.
Rome’s Constitutional Questions About Unlimited Bloodline Citizenship
So, what’s the Court of Rome looking at regarding citizenship? Specifically, it’s Article 1, paragraph 1, letter a), of Italy’s Citizenship Law (No. 91/1992). This is the basic rule: if your parent was an Italian citizen, you are too by birth. The judge, however, wasn’t entirely convinced this simple rule, as it’s currently applied, holds up against Italy’s Constitution, and has asked the highest Constitutional Court to weigh in.
Here’s a breakdown of the judge’s main concerns:
Clash with Foundational Ideas (Constitution Art. 1 – Sovereignty & Art. 3 – Reasonableness)
- The judge points out that citizenship is key – it defines the “people” who hold sovereignty in Italy (Art. 1 of the Constitution).
- Yet, the way jure sanguinis works now (based on long-standing court practice, the “diritto vivente”) lets people trace back potentially countless generations to find an Italian ancestor. This can happen even if the applicant, their parents, grandparents, etc., never lived in Italy or had any real, tangible connection – think social ties, cultural engagement, or residency.
- The ruling suggests this disconnects citizenship from the idea of being part of an active community. It risks becoming a kind of abstract, almost “private” status, missing that element of “effectiveness” – a genuine social bond with the country – which is recognized internationally and even acknowledged in principle by Italy’s top courts (like the Corte Costituzionale), though not previously used to limit jure sanguinis.
- When you consider the sheer number of people globally who might qualify through a distant ancestor (potentially millions), the judge worries this could dilute the very meaning of the Italian “people” and who holds sovereignty. This makes the current unlimited reach of the law look potentially unreasonable and out of step with its likely goal: ensuring the natural continuation of the actual community tied to Italy. The Court of Rome citizenship ordinance highlights this potential issue.
- Essentially, the court questions relying only on the blood tie, generation after generation, without asking for some concrete link along the way. Italy stands out in having almost no generational cut-off.
Unequal Treatment Concerns (Constitution Art. 3)
- The ordinance then compares this wide-open jure sanguinis route to other ways people become Italian citizens under the very same law (like Arts. 4, 5, and 9 – covering descendants of former citizens, spouses, or long-term residents).
- Crucially, all those other paths demand proof of a real connection: living legally in Italy for specific periods, working for the state, knowing the language (to a B1 level for many cases), having no serious criminal record, etc.
- The judge asks: is it fair or reasonable to make it so much easier for someone whose only link is a great-great-grandparent they never knew, compared to, say, the grandchild of someone who was a citizen but lost it (Art. 4), someone actually born and raised in Italy (Art. 4, c. 2), or someone who builds ties through marriage or years of residency? All these others face much stricter requirements. This comparison is central to the Court of Rome citizenship questioning.
- The court sees a strong parallel between people descending from generations who never actively claimed or lived as Italians (making their citizenship status somewhat “dormant”) and those whose ancestor formally lost citizenship. In both scenarios, the present-day connection is often missing.
- It challenges the logic of treating someone born into an active, participating Italian family (the standard way citizenship passes down) exactly the same as someone claiming a purely formal citizenship based on distant ancestry, detached from the living Italian community (civitas).
What Does This Mean For Your Court of Rome Citizenship Application?
It’s important to remember the Court of Rome hasn’t changed the law. It has flagged a serious constitutional question for the higher court (Corte Costituzionale) to decide. The judge even hinted at possible ways to adjust the law, perhaps taking cues from other parts of the citizenship code (like Art. 4). Ideas floated include:
- Requiring proof of citizenship directly from the parent, not just a grandparent or earlier ancestor, for automatic recognition.
- Maybe applying rules similar to Art. 4 (which often involve residency or other links) if the connection skips the parent generation and goes to the grandparent.
- Potentially ruling out citizenship based solely on birth if the Italian ancestor is further back than a grandparent.
This ruling really captures the dynamic legal and political discussion happening around jure sanguinis in Italy today. It brings into focus the balance between honoring ancestral ties and the modern idea that citizenship involves some level of real connection to the country. The focus on Court of Rome citizenship cases has brought this issue to the forefront.
For anyone applying or thinking of applying, this situation highlights why staying informed and getting reliable legal advice is key. The final word from the Constitutional Court is still pending, and the legal ground might shift. Our commitment at ItalyGet is to guide you through the process based on the law as it stands today, while keeping a close eye on these developments and being ready to adapt our strategy to best defend your right to recognition, especially concerning any proceedings at the Court of Rome or impacts from its citizenship-related decisions.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) about the Court of Rome Citizenship Ruling
- What is the recent Court of Rome citizenship ordinance about?
The Court of Rome has raised constitutional questions about Italy’s Citizenship Law (No. 91/1992), specifically concerning the unlimited generational reach of citizenship by bloodline (jure sanguinis). It questions if requiring only a blood tie, without proof of connection to Italy, is reasonable and fair compared to other citizenship pathways. - Does the Court of Rome ruling stop Italian citizenship jure sanguinis applications?
No, the Court of Rome has not changed the law itself. It has referred the question to Italy’s Constitutional Court for a final decision. While the outcome is pending, applications based on the current law continue, but the ruling introduces uncertainty about potential future changes. - How could the Court of Rome citizenship decision affect future applicants?
If the Constitutional Court agrees with the Court of Rome, the rules for jure sanguinis might change. Potential adjustments could include requiring proof of citizenship directly from a parent (not just grandparents or earlier ancestors) or imposing residency or other connection requirements similar to other parts of the citizenship law, possibly limiting claims based on very distant ancestors.What is ‘effectiveness’ in the context of the - What is the Court of Rome citizenship legal ground?
Effectiveness refers to having a genuine, tangible connection or social bond with Italy. The Court of Rome ordinance suggests that granting citizenship based purely on a distant bloodline, without any evidence of such a connection (like residency, social ties, or cultural engagement), might lack this ‘effectiveness’.
Leave a Reply