Breaking: Court of Mantua Raises Constitutional Challenge on the New Citizenship Law for Minors
🚨 UPDATE — JULY 2026
Since the Court of Mantua issued this referral (October 24, 2025), the constitutional saga has continued. On April 30, 2026, Ruling 63/2026 upheld Art. 3-bis of Law 74/2025 on the Turin challenge; the generational-limits question raised here — together with Campobasso — was referred to the Court of Justice of the EU by Order 147/2026 (July 23, 2026); and the Minor Issue at the heart of this case was ended by the Sezioni Unite in Ruling 24045/2026 (July 27, 2026). The Mantua challenge is now part of the European battle.
The new Italian citizenship law (Law 74/2025), which introduced significant changes to citizenship regulations, has created considerable uncertainty. This is especially true for families with minor children born abroad whose parents have only recently been recognized as Italian citizens. In this context, an ordinance from the Court of Mantua, issued on October 24, 2025, marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing legal debate.
Executive Summary: The Court of Mantua’s referral order (October 24, 2025) challenged Law 74/2025 on three grounds: implicit revocation of citizenship acquired at birth (Art. 22 of the Constitution), arbitrary application deadlines discriminating against equally situated citizens (Art. 3), and the legislative method — a Decree-Law for a fundamental matter (Arts. 72 and 77). The case, concerning a minor born abroad, was part of the “Minor Issue” ended by the Sezioni Unite in Ruling 24045/2026; the generational-limits question is now before the CJEU under Order 147/2026.
What Legal Principle Is at the Heart of the Mantua Challenge?
The legal analysis of the case hinges on a fundamental principle: a new law should not retroactively undermine a subjective right already perfected, such as citizenship by descent (*iure sanguinis*), which is acquired at birth. The Court of Mantua’s ordinance embraces this view, reinforcing it with legal arguments that the new regulation has constitutional flaws, particularly regarding its retroactive application. For a deeper dive into this topic, see our article on the constitutional challenge to the citizenship law.
What Did the Court of Mantua Rule in Its Referral Order?
To grasp the decision’s importance, it’s useful to analyze how the Court of Mantua examined Law 74/2025. The case involved a Civil Status Officer’s refusal to register the birth certificate of a minor born in Brazil to a mother whose Italian citizenship was recognized by a court. The municipality’s decision was based on a literal reading of the new law, which imposes new conditions and deadlines for recognition.
The Court, however, took a different approach, raising three main constitutional questions.
1. The “Implicit Revocation” Argument (Violation of Art. 22 of the Constitution)
The ordinance’s central point is its interpretation of the law’s effects. While the legislator frames it as a “failure to acquire,” the Court of Mantua identifies an “implicit revocation” of an already acquired status. Article 22 of the Italian Constitution states: “No one may be deprived, for political reasons, of legal capacity, citizenship, or name.” The judges interpret “political reasons” broadly to include “public interest” arguments used by the Government to justify the new Italian citizenship law (like managing application backlogs). The ordinance posits that citizenship, acquired at birth, is a fundamental right and cannot be withdrawn for political or administrative convenience.
2. The “Arbitrary Deadlines” Argument (Violation of Art. 3 of the Constitution)
Secondly, the Court highlights the law’s potential unreasonableness. Article 3 of the Constitution guarantees equality and protects citizens’ “legitimate expectation” in legal stability. The new law, the judges argue, creates discrimination: two individuals born before its enactment in the same situation are treated differently based on an arbitrary application deadline (March 27, 2025). This issue is critical when registering a minor under the new law. According to the Court, this undermines the legitimate expectation of those who, already citizens by birth, trusted they could request formal recognition at any time.
3. The “Legislative Method” Argument (Violation of Arts. 72 and 77 of the Constitution)
Finally, the ordinance questions the method of the law’s introduction. The Government used a Decree-Law, an instrument for “extraordinary necessity and urgency.” The Court of Mantua argues that a fundamental matter like citizenship, which defines the nation’s people and affects the electorate, should be subject to a parliamentary legislative reserve, requiring a full parliamentary debate. The Government’s reasons—overloaded consulates and courts—do not, in the judges’ view, constitute the unforeseeable urgency justifying an emergency decree.
Is a Jurisprudential Trend Against Law 74/2025 Emerging?
It is noteworthy that the Court of Mantua’s position is not unique. A similar case is pending before the Court of Turin. A legal trend is emerging that questions the new legislation’s sustainability. The final word will come from the Constitutional Court, but the foundations of the new Italian citizenship law are now under intense judicial scrutiny. You can read more about the core of this topic in our article explaining the Italian citizenship and minor issue.
The judicial petition was filed by Avv. Alfonso Celotto and Avv. Maria Stella La Malfa.
Frequently Asked Questions About the Court of Mantua Referral
What did the Court of Mantua decide in October 2025?
The Court of Mantua issued a referral order raising three constitutional questions on Law 74/2025: the implicit revocation of citizenship acquired at birth (violation of Art. 22 of the Constitution), arbitrary application deadlines discriminating between citizens (violation of Art. 3), and the use of a Decree-Law for a fundamental matter (violation of Arts. 72 and 77).
What is the “Minor Issue” in Italian citizenship?
The “Minor Issue” concerns minors born abroad to parents recognized as Italian citizens, whose registration was blocked by Law 74/2025. The Sezioni Unite ended the controversy on July 27, 2026 with Ruling No. 24045/2026.
What happened to the Mantua referral after Order 147/2026?
On July 23, 2026, the Constitutional Court issued Order No. 147/2026 referring the generational-limits question of Law 74/2025 — raised by the Courts of Mantua and Campobasso — to the Court of Justice of the EU.
Is Law 74/2025 still in force?
Yes. Law 74/2025 remains in force. Ruling 63/2026 of the Constitutional Court (April 30, 2026) upheld Art. 3-bis on the Turin challenge, but the generational-limits question is now pending before the CJEU (Order 147/2026).
Was Your Child’s Citizenship Affected by the 2025 Reform?
If you are dealing with a minor’s registration, a rejection, or a pending case, I can assess your position in light of Ruling 24045/2026 (Minor Issue) and the CJEU referral (Order 147/2026).
Full text of the decision, AI-translated in English
Full text of the decision, Italian
Lost Italian Citizenship Due to Foreign Naturalization Before 1992?
Download the official 5-Document Eligibility Checklist for the extraordinary Law 74/2025 statutory window (2025–2027) and verify if you qualify to reacquire Italian citizenship.
